Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pengalihan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Sepengetahuan Penerima Fidusia (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 103/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Pre)


Taufan, Muhammad Ilhamsyah (2023) Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pengalihan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Sepengetahuan Penerima Fidusia (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 103/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Pre). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Hasanuddin.

[thumbnail of B011181560_skripsi_27-12-2023 cover1.png]
Preview
Image
B011181560_skripsi_27-12-2023 cover1.png

Download (212kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of B011181560_skripsi_27-12-2023 1-2.pdf] Text
B011181560_skripsi_27-12-2023 1-2.pdf

Download (510kB)
[thumbnail of B011181560_skripsi_27-12-2023 dp.pdf] Text
B011181560_skripsi_27-12-2023 dp.pdf

Download (126kB)
[thumbnail of B011181560_skripsi_27-12-2023.pdf] Text
B011181560_skripsi_27-12-2023.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (927kB)

Abstract (Abstrak)

MUHAMMAD ILHAMSYAH TAUFAN (B011181560) with the title "Juridical Analysis of the Crime of Transferring Fiduciary Guarantee Objects Without the Knowledge of the Fiduciary Recipient (STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 103/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Pre)". Supervised by Said Karim as the main supervisor and Syarif Saddam Rivanie as the accompanying supervisor.

This study aims to determine the qualifications of the criminal act of the perpetrator of the transfer of collateral objects without the knowledge of the fiduciary recipient based on decision number 103/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Pre and analyze the application of criminal law to the crime of fiduciary recipients in decision number 103/Pid.Sus/2021 /PN. Pre).

This research is normative legal research. The approach used is a statutory approach (Statute Approach) and a case approach (Case Approach). The data obtained were then analyzed with qualitative methods and then presented with prescriptive methods.

The results of this thesis research show that; 1) The qualifications for the transfer of the fiduciary guarantee object are seen based on the existence of a legal relationship between the debtor as the fiduciary guarantee provider and the creditor as the recipient of the fiduciary guarantee based on the financing agreement and the fiduciary guarantee deed, the criminal liability of the fiduciary giver who transfers the fiduciary guarantee object without the knowledge or without the written consent of the fiduciary recipient as referred to in Decision Number 103/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Pre. based on the existence of an error from the Defendant as the fiduciary provider which included intentional or negligent, while the act committed was an act that was prohibited and punishable by crime as stipulated in Article 36 UUJF. 2) Basic considerations of Judges in imposing sentencing decisions against fiduciary givers who transfer fiduciary guarantee objects without written consent from fiduciary recipients in a juridical manner indictment of the Public Prosecutor against the Defendant by violating the provisions of Article 36 UUJF.

Item Type: Thesis (Skripsi)
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions (Program Studi): Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User: Nasyir Nompo
Date Deposited: 09 Sep 2024 00:36
Last Modified: 09 Sep 2024 00:36
URI: http://repository.unhas.ac.id:443/id/eprint/37141

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item