Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Memproduksi Uang Rupiah Palsu (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor : 219/PID.B/2019/PN.TTE) = Legal Analysis Of The Criminal Act Of Producing Counterfeit Rupiah Money (Study Of Decision Number : 219/ PID.B/2019/PN.TTE)

ATIKA (B011181411) LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE CRIMINAL ACT OF PRODUCING COUNTERFEIT RUPIAH MONEY (CASE STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 214/PID.B/2019/PN.TTE). Supervised by Haeranah as the Main Supervisor and Audyna Mayasari Muin as the Assistant Supervisor. Background : The crime of counterfeiting rupiah banknotes is an attack on the legal interest in trust in money as a legal means of payment. The case with decision number 214/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Tte is related to counterfeiting rupiah, with an alternative indictment from the public prosecutor which in the rules can be charged in another form to realize the judge's consideration of proportionality. Objective : This study aims to analyze the application of material criminal law and the judge's legal considerations for the crime of producing counterfeit Rupiah in decision number 214/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Tte. Method : This study uses a normative legal research type with a statutory approach and a case approach. The legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials and are analyzed prescriptively-normatively. Results : This study shows that (1) The application of material criminal law by the Public Prosecutor to the criminal case of producing counterfeit Rupiah in case number 214/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Tte, namely the Public Prosecutor can charge in cumulative form and apply the article on concursus realis. So that an appropriate sentence can be imposed in order to provide a deterrent effect on the defendant and provide a sense of justice for the unrest that has been caused. (2) The Judge's legal considerations in passing a verdict in case number 214/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Tte, are not quite right because the Judge's legal considerations do not show any proportionality and do not fulfill a sense of justice because in the author's view the Judge should be able to decide using ultra petita by considering the existence of concursus realis as an aggravating reason. Conclusion: The application of material criminal law by the Public Prosecutor and the Judge's legal considerations in issuing a criminal sentence were inappropriate due to the use of an alternative indictment so that the Judge only decided on one criminal act committed by the defendant in accordance with the indictment without considering the concurrent criminal acts in his actions. Keywords: Counterfeit Rupiah; Crime; Producing.