TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENGHASUTAN UNTUK MELAKUKAN PERUSAKAN KANTOR PEMERINTAHAN (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 35/Pid.B/2020/PN Slr)

ABSTRACT
Ridion Pailang (B011181439) with the title “Juridical Review of the Crime of Incitement to Destruction of Government Offices (Case Study Decision Number 35/Pid.B/2020/PN Slr). Under the guidance of Abd. Asis, as the main supervisor and Haeranah, as the companion mentor.

This study aims to analyze the qualifications of the crime of incitement to destroy Government Offices and legal considerations by the panel of judges in sentencing the perpetrators of the crime of incitement to destroy Government Offices in Decision Number: 35/Pid.B/2020/PN Slr.

This study uses a normative law research method using a statutory approach and a case approach. The legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials which are collected and analyzed in a prescriptive-normative manner to produce a conclusion.

The results of the research show (1) The crime of incitement to destroy a Government Office can be qualified as a criminal act as regulated in Article 160 of the Criminal Code. Based on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 7/PUU-VII/2009 which states that Article 160 is Conditionally Constitutional or constitutional as long as it is interpreted as a material offense. (2) Based on the author's analysis, the consideration of the panel of judges in imposing the sentence in Decision Number 35/Pid.B/2020/PN Slr has complied with each element of the Article charged, this is based on juridical and non-juridical considerations by the panel of judges.

Keywords: Incitement; destruction.